<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Technical Articles on Brandon Castellano</title>
		<link>https://www.bcastell.com/categories/technical-articles/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Technical Articles on Brandon Castellano</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.bcastell.com/categories/technical-articles/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>How does word length affect the performance and operation of a CPU?</title>
				<link>https://www.bcastell.com/posts/word-length-vs-performance/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.bcastell.com/posts/word-length-vs-performance/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;About a year ago, I came across a question on Super User titled &amp;ldquo;How much faster is a 64-bit CPU than a 32-bit CPU?&amp;rdquo;, which was promptly closed and deleted since it&amp;rsquo;s a very open ended question. However, the author (a software developer) referred to benchmarks regarding system performance in 32-bit versus 64-bit. The purpose of this blog post is to investigate how the performance of a computer is affected, as a function of the word length.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Fixing the XAnalogTV Screensaver</title>
				<link>https://www.bcastell.com/posts/fixing-xanalogtv/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.bcastell.com/posts/fixing-xanalogtv/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This post is currently being migrated from the old location, &lt;a href=&#34;https://web.archive.org/web/20160307233103/http://www.bcastell.com/tech-articles/fixing-the-xanalogtv-screensaver/&#34;&gt;click here to view the old one on The Wayback Machine&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
